Bufferbloat and VOIP

At the host, VOIP packets are usually emitted at a multiple of 10ms intervals. They are very small (usually less than 300 bytes), and very delay sensitive. If you delay more than 10ms, it makes sense to simply throw away the packet you have and send the next one, immediately.

There are those doing kernel development that think that 10-20ms jitter or 40ms latency is OK. It’s not, for VOIP. 10-20ms jitter translates out (worst case) to throwing half of your packets away at the receiver, and interpolating the other half. It is far better to aim for below 10ms jitter, at which point voice quality is only dependent on packet loss.

Given that there is about a 4ms transmit window for wireless, I’d like to go for 4ms maximum delay and jitter across the entire transmit range of that technology.

That’s on the host, which we can control. After voip escapes the host, all sorts of delay and jitter can occur, but it usually evens out. The problem with accepting high delays is that above 250ms or so is that conversations flow badly; people step on each other.

The speed of light on fiber around the world is around half a second, so no matter what you do, you’re in a losing situation. Artificially adding 40ms delay, randomly, is like adding the 3/4ths the width of the Continental USA to the conversation.

Due to its continuous nature, every delay spike will add to the delay for the rest of the conversation. There are algorithms (eg WSOLA) that enable the receiver to drain a full buffer by “talking faster”, but even if those algorithms were perfect, they would alter the meaning of a spoken phrase at some point.

ITU T G.114 recommends a mouth-to-ear delay of under 150 ms.


(source ITU T G.114)

Admittedly the real point is different; there is no single right answer, and the right latency we have to strive for is of order 1 packet; but that will take AQM we don’t have yet. We’re always reluctant to argue against mitigation, when real solution still evades us.

However, plugging in the 4ms constraint into the network stack gives us numbers to work with and goals to aim for.

Attachments

To edit this page, submit a pull request to the Github repository.
RSS feed

Recent Updates

Dec 2, 2024 Wiki page
What Can I Do About Bufferbloat?
Dec 1, 2024 Wiki page
Bufferbloat FAQs
Jul 21, 2024 Wiki page
cake-autorate
Jul 21, 2024 Wiki page
Tests for Bufferbloat
Jul 1, 2024 Wiki page
RRUL Chart Explanation

Find us elsewhere

Bufferbloat Mailing Lists
#bufferbloat on Twitter
Google+ group
Archived Bufferbloat pages from the Wayback Machine

Sponsors

Comcast Research Innovation Fund
Nlnet Foundation
Shuttleworth Foundation
GoFundMe

Bufferbloat Related Projects

OpenWrt Project
Congestion Control Blog
Flent Network Test Suite
Sqm-Scripts
The Cake shaper
AQMs in BSD
IETF AQM WG
CeroWrt (where it all started)

Network Performance Related Resources


Jim Gettys' Blog - The chairman of the Fjord
Toke's Blog - Karlstad University's work on bloat
Voip Users Conference - Weekly Videoconference mostly about voip
Candelatech - A wifi testing company that "gets it".